會員
帖子總數: 97
註冊: 2011/4/20
|
|
已發表: 2019/3/25 下午8:31
|
|
|
|
The sync app is logging each player's familiar it encounters as a unique NPC. As such, there are a bunch of "new" NPCs in PoK and the Guild Lobby. Perhaps sync needs to be trained to ignore NPCs like "Bob's familiar".
|
|
|
|
會員
帖子總數: 58
註冊: 2009/2/12
|
|
已發表: 2019/3/26 上午8:04
|
|
|
|
Are 'pet', and 'warder' tags being ignored or added?
|
|
|
|
會員
帖子總數: 97
註冊: 2011/4/20
|
|
會員
帖子總數: 58
註冊: 2009/2/12
|
|
已發表: 2019/3/27 上午8:04
|
|
|
|
Hmmmm, do your examples have their 'original' name or have they been renamed?
|
|
|
|
會員
帖子總數: 97
註冊: 2011/4/20
|
|
已發表: 2019/3/27 下午8:58
|
|
|
At first glance, they would appear not to be renamed as they all bear the name of the associated player, at least in Magelo. However, I haven't been able to replicate the problem by targeting or inspecting mercenaries, familiars, or pets.
Still, I see new companions daily at https://eq.magelo.com/npcs.jspa which do not have an associated NPC.
|
|
|
|
會員
帖子總數: 97
註冊: 2011/4/20
|
|
已發表: 2019/4/1 下午8:43
|
|
|
|
I finally spotted one of these in the wild today: . It was hanging out by the zone line for Blightfire Moors in Crescent Reach on the Vox server. As the entry says, it was an sokokar with a saddle. The coloration was emerald. There was no player named Sharpjaws present at the time. I wonder if the player went linkdead and the familiar was left behind. Still, it seems odd that Magelo Sync would treat it as a new NPC.
|
|
|
|
